CIAI.TO vs. FDN.TO
CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and FDN.TO (First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CIAI.TO is actively managed, while FDN.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CIAI.TO returned 33.36% vs 6.66% for FDN.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CIAI.TO vs. FDN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than FDN.TO's 4.51% return.
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- 6M
- 13.47%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDN.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- 3.50%
CIAI.TO vs. FDN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 19.44% | 18.84% | 29.92% |
FDN.TO First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF | 4.51% | 5.45% | 26.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIAI.TO and FDN.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIAI.TO vs. FDN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CIAI.TO
FDN.TO
CIAI.TO vs. FDN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIAI.TO | FDN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.08 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 0.30 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | 0.68 | +4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIAI.TO vs. FDN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, smaller than the maximum FDN.TO drawdown of -50.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and FDN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIAI.TO | FDN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -50.44% | +19.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.93% | -21.40% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.02% | -3.22% | -6.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -10.74% | +4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 9.44% | -2.57% |
Volatility
CIAI.TO vs. FDN.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO) at 5.14%. This indicates that CIAI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIAI.TO | FDN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 5.14% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.08% | 16.42% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.21% | 19.77% | +7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 26.12% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 21.15% | +8.02% |
Dividends
CIAI.TO vs. FDN.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIAI.TO nor FDN.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDN.TO First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.65% | 5.69% | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.76% | 1.51% | 1.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIAI.TO and FDN.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and First Trust.
Find the right allocation for CIAI.TO and FDN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer