CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO
CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and CCOM.TO (CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - CIAI.TO is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by CI, while CCOM.TO is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index. CIAI.TO is actively managed, while CCOM.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CIAI.TO returned 31.56% vs 23.50% for CCOM.TO. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CIAI.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for CCOM.TO.
Performance
CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly higher than CCOM.TO's 14.17% return.
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- 6M
- 17.06%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 31.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.70%
CCOM.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$73.22K | CA$113.43K | CA$307.55K | |
| CA$1.13M | CA$1.20M | CA$2.71M |
CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 19.72% | 18.84% | 29.92% |
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 14.17% | 6.96% | 0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIAI.TO and CCOM.TO is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CIAI.TO
CCOM.TO
CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIAI.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.38 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 2.70 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.79 | 7.92 | -4.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, which is greater than CCOM.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and CCOM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIAI.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -9.79% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.93% | -7.73% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.81% | -4.41% | -5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -3.07% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.20% | 2.70% | +4.50% |
Volatility
CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) at 2.70%. This indicates that CIAI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIAI.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.77% | 2.70% | +8.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.36% | 8.06% | +15.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.32% | 10.24% | +18.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.48% | 8.45% | +21.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.48% | 8.45% | +21.03% |
CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIAI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIAI.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Dividend Comparison
CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 13.17% | 3.48% | 6.99% | 4.21% |
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIAI.TO and CCOM.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIAI.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIAI.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CCOM.TO.
CIAI.TO is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while CCOM.TO is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CIAI.TO and 0.73% for CCOM.TO.
Find the right allocation for CIAI.TO and CCOM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer