CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) and BGIN.NEO (BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CIAI.TO returned 61.33% vs 88.73% for BGIN.NEO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIAI.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for BGIN.NEO.

Performance

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a 30.47% return, which is significantly lower than BGIN.NEO's 54.53% return.

CIAI.TO

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 13.50%
• YTD: 30.47%
• 6M: 25.50%
• 1Y: 61.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BGIN.NEO

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 21.71%
• YTD: 54.53%
• 6M: 53.21%
• 1Y: 88.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	30.47%	18.84%	29.92%
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series	54.53%	19.37%	18.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CIAI.TO and BGIN.NEO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2024	0.51

Over the past year, CIAI.TO and BGIN.NEO have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIAI.TO

CIAI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 68
CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
CIAI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CIAI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CIAI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
CIAI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

BGIN.NEO

BGIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 92
BGIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BGIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BGIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BGIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BGIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CIAI.TO	BGIN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	3.44	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	4.02	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.64	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	6.75	-3.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	21.35	-11.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the BGIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIAI.TO and BGIN.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CIAI.TO	BGIN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	3.44	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.42	1.57	-0.15

Drawdowns

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, which is greater than BGIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and BGIN.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIAI.TO	BGIN.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.22%	-29.19%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.93%	-13.23%	-5.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.71%	0.00%	-1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-4.44%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.55%	4.17%	+2.38%

Volatility

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) is 7.26%, while BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that CIAI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIAI.TO	BGIN.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	9.24%	-1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.43%	21.40%	-2.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.92%	25.92%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.38%	26.10%	+2.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.38%	26.10%	+2.28%

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIAI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIN.NEO's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

CIAI.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGIN.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series	0.19%	0.30%	0.36%	0.12%
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIAI.TO and BGIN.NEO in my portfolio?

CIAI.TO and BGIN.NEO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CIAI.TO or BGIN.NEO?

On fees, CIAI.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CIAI.TO or BGIN.NEO?

CIAI.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.

What is the main difference between CIAI.TO and BGIN.NEO?

They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CIAI.TO and 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.