PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CI2G.L

1D
1.23%
1M
-3.40%
YTD
-12.55%
6M
-13.41%
1Y
-12.56%
3Y*
1.96%
5Y*
3.82%
10Y*
7.30%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CI2G.L
Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD
-12.55%-5.46%11.34%12.20%2.39%24.86%10.51%1.30%-2.46%10.55%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%23.29%-4.10%6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CI2G.L and MWRD.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.44

The correlation between CI2G.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CI2G.L
MWRD.L

Financial Services

28.3%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
10.5%

Industrials

10.2%
10.6%

Energy

9.5%
4.4%

Basic Materials

8.5%
3.8%

Technology

8.2%
24.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
6.7%

Healthcare

6.1%
12.4%

Communication Services

4.7%
7.5%

Utilities

4.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

CI2G.L
28.3%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CI2G.L
12.4%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Industrials

CI2G.L
10.2%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Energy

CI2G.L
9.5%
MWRD.L
4.4%

Basic Materials

CI2G.L
8.5%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Technology

CI2G.L
8.2%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Consumer Defensive

CI2G.L
6.2%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Healthcare

CI2G.L
6.1%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Communication Services

CI2G.L
4.7%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Utilities

CI2G.L
4.5%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Real Estate

CI2G.L
1.3%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CI2G.L
CI2G.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CI2G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CI2G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CI2G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CI2G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CI2G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CI2G.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CI2G.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

Drawdowns

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CI2G.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.84%

Volatility

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CI2G.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CI2G.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

CI2G.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CI2G.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CI2G.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CI2G.L.

CI2G.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. CI2G.L tracks MSCI India NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CI2G.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CI2G.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer