CI2G.L vs. INRL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) and Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L).
CI2G.L and INRL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CI2G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. INRL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on Nov 7, 2006. Both CI2G.L and INRL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CI2G.L or INRL.L.
Key characteristics
| CI2G.L | INRL.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.23% | 10.77% |
| 1Y Return | 21.67% | 21.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.73% | 7.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.61% | 11.31% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.45 | 1.43 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.93 | 1.90 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.80 | 2.79 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.04 | 10.16 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.12% | 2.11% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.66% | 14.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.13% | -37.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.61% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CI2G.L and INRL.L is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CI2G.L vs. INRL.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CI2G.L having a 11.23% return and INRL.L slightly lower at 10.77%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CI2G.L vs. INRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CI2G.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than INRL.L's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CI2G.L vs. INRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) and Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CI2G.L vs. INRL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CI2G.L nor INRL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CI2G.L vs. INRL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI2G.L drawdown since its inception was -37.13%, roughly equal to the maximum INRL.L drawdown of -37.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI2G.L and INRL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CI2G.L vs. INRL.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (CI2G.L) and Lyxor MSCI India UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (INRL.L) have volatilities of 3.49% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.