CHYDX vs. PRCPX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CHYDX (Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund) and PRCPX (T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, CHYDX returned 5.04%/yr vs 6.52%/yr for PRCPX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHYDX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for PRCPX.

Performance

CHYDX vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHYDX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than PRCPX's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, CHYDX has underperformed PRCPX with an annualized return of 5.04%, while PRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.52% annualized return.

CHYDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 1.77%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 6.22%
• 3Y*: 8.25%
• 5Y*: 3.80%
• 10Y*: 5.04%

PRCPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 1.67%
• 6M: 3.14%
• 1Y: 9.67%
• 3Y*: 10.66%
• 5Y*: 5.63%
• 10Y*: 6.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHYDX vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund	1.77%	6.72%	7.78%	12.26%	-10.35%	6.44%	4.78%	14.29%	-4.30%	6.05%
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund	1.67%	11.51%	9.36%	14.90%	-10.50%	6.36%	5.55%	13.77%	-1.44%	6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CHYDX and PRCPX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014	0.74

The correlation between CHYDX and PRCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CHYDX vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHYDX

CHYDX Risk / Return Rank: 88
CHYDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CHYDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CHYDX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CHYDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CHYDX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

PRCPX

PRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 94
PRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHYDX vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHYDX	PRCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	2.95	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.49	5.57	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.75	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	4.89	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.86	23.39	-6.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHYDX vs. PRCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHYDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the PRCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHYDX and PRCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHYDX	PRCPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81	2.95	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	1.18	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	1.20	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	0.88	+0.18

Drawdowns

CHYDX vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHYDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHYDX and PRCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHYDX	PRCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.03%	-23.07%	-11.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.73%	-1.99%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.50%	-3.83%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.66%	-14.34%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.35%	-23.07%	-0.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.25%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-3.12%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.41%	-0.04%

Volatility

CHYDX vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) is 0.69%, while T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) has a volatility of 0.90%. This indicates that CHYDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHYDX	PRCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	0.90%	-0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.72%	2.39%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22%	3.29%	-1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.07%	4.81%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	5.45%	-0.49%

CHYDX vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHYDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHYDX vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison

CHYDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, less than PRCPX's 9.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund	6.08%	6.39%	6.30%	6.28%	5.47%	4.48%	5.26%	5.85%	6.62%	4.87%	4.94%	5.43%
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund	9.28%	9.32%	8.77%	7.88%	4.89%	5.11%	5.36%	5.18%	5.72%	4.95%	5.88%	7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHYDX and PRCPX in my portfolio?

CHYDX and PRCPX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHYDX or PRCPX?

PRCPX has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to CHYDX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHYDX dropped -35.03% vs PRCPX's -23.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.