CHYDX vs. MDHVX
CHYDX (Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund) and MDHVX (MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, CHYDX returned 5.01%/yr vs 4.60%/yr for MDHVX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHYDX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MDHVX.
Performance
CHYDX vs. MDHVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHYDX achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than MDHVX's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, CHYDX has outperformed MDHVX with an annualized return of 5.01%, while MDHVX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.60% annualized return.
CHYDX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.01%
MDHVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 4.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.60%
CHYDX vs. MDHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund | 2.03% | 6.72% | 7.78% | 12.26% | -10.35% | 6.44% | 4.78% | 14.29% | -4.30% | 6.05% |
MDHVX MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund | 1.85% | 5.38% | 6.51% | 9.86% | -2.81% | 4.38% | 2.92% | 9.00% | -0.13% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHYDX and MDHVX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2012 | 0.74 |
The correlation between CHYDX and MDHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHYDX vs. MDHVX — Risk / Return Rank
CHYDX
MDHVX
CHYDX vs. MDHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHYDX | MDHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.72 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 4.79 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.12 | 23.69 | -6.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHYDX vs. MDHVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHYDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, which is greater than MDHVX's maximum drawdown of -18.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHYDX and MDHVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHYDX | MDHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.03% | -18.04% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.73% | -1.06% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.50% | -2.65% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.66% | -6.26% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.35% | -18.04% | -5.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -0.77% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.21% | +0.16% |
Volatility
CHYDX vs. MDHVX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) at 0.44%. This indicates that CHYDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHYDX | MDHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | 0.44% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.77% | 1.43% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 1.82% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.07% | 2.58% | +1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 3.42% | +1.54% |
CHYDX vs. MDHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHYDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MDHVX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHYDX vs. MDHVX - Dividend Comparison
CHYDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than MDHVX's 5.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund | 6.06% | 6.39% | 6.30% | 6.28% | 5.47% | 4.48% | 5.26% | 5.85% | 6.62% | 4.87% | 4.94% | 5.43% |
MDHVX MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund | 5.33% | 5.47% | 6.01% | 5.53% | 4.31% | 3.80% | 4.44% | 4.37% | 4.33% | 4.03% | 4.95% | 4.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHYDX and MDHVX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHYDX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to MDHVX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHYDX dropped -35.03% vs MDHVX's -18.04%.
CHYDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHYDX and MDHVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer