PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHY vs. CVGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHY vs. CVGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHY achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly higher than CVGRX's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CHY has underperformed CVGRX with an annualized return of 12.95%, while CVGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.85% annualized return.


CHY

1D
-1.05%
1M
6.74%
YTD
21.02%
6M
21.09%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
12.95%

CVGRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
6.96%
YTD
11.13%
6M
10.25%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
24.26%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
14.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHY vs. CVGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHY
Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund
21.02%3.97%17.24%20.78%-28.05%22.17%36.75%32.63%-12.60%24.44%
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
11.13%16.08%32.32%37.64%-33.33%23.06%32.97%31.11%-6.14%26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CHY and CVGRX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2003

0.49

The correlation between CHY and CVGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHY vs. CVGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHY
CHY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CVGRX
CVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHY vs. CVGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHYCVGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

1.80

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.10

6.76

+11.35

CHY vs. CVGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the CVGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHY and CVGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHYCVGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.75

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.59

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.69

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.51

-0.11

Drawdowns

CHY vs. CVGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHY drawdown since its inception was -60.53%, roughly equal to the maximum CVGRX drawdown of -61.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHY and CVGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHYCVGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.53%

-61.65%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-16.00%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.32%

-23.81%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.99%

-37.43%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.41%

-37.43%

-12.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.11%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-11.50%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

4.26%

-2.02%

Volatility

CHY vs. CVGRX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) at 3.69%. This indicates that CHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHYCVGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

3.69%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

12.71%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.72%

16.48%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

21.81%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.27%

21.61%

+1.66%

CHY vs. CVGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHY has a 2.64% expense ratio, which is higher than CVGRX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHY vs. CVGRX - Dividend Comparison

CHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, more than CVGRX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHY
Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund
9.06%10.61%9.88%10.46%11.37%7.42%7.14%8.72%12.13%10.13%11.37%11.42%
CVGRX
Calamos Growth Fund
7.93%8.81%6.66%4.48%0.00%12.17%11.25%9.71%16.86%13.75%4.12%35.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHY and CVGRX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHY has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to CVGRX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHY dropped -60.53% vs CVGRX's -61.65%.

CHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHY and CVGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer