PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHY vs. CICVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHY vs. CICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHY achieves a 21.02% return, which is significantly lower than CICVX's 26.40% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHY having a 12.95% annualized return and CICVX not far behind at 12.56%.


CHY

1D
-1.05%
1M
6.74%
YTD
21.02%
6M
21.09%
1Y
40.53%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
12.95%

CICVX

1D
1.49%
1M
7.82%
YTD
26.40%
6M
26.09%
1Y
46.23%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHY vs. CICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHY
Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund
21.02%3.97%17.24%20.78%-28.05%22.17%36.75%32.63%-12.60%24.44%
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
26.40%19.03%9.94%10.95%-21.02%5.36%48.84%19.51%0.59%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CHY and CICVX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2003

0.53

Over the past year, CHY and CICVX have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHY vs. CICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHY
CHY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CICVX
CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHY vs. CICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHYCICVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.55

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

6.18

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.10

24.05

-5.94

CHY vs. CICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the CICVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHY and CICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHYCICVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

3.21

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.67

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.98

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.35

+0.05

Drawdowns

CHY vs. CICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHY drawdown since its inception was -60.53%, which is greater than CICVX's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHY and CICVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHYCICVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.53%

-49.33%

-11.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-7.70%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.32%

-14.79%

-9.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.99%

-27.17%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.41%

-27.17%

-23.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

0.00%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-17.48%

+8.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.98%

+0.26%

Volatility

CHY vs. CICVX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund (CHY) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) at 5.22%. This indicates that CHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHYCICVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

5.22%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.35%

12.17%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.72%

14.86%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

12.89%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.27%

12.89%

+10.38%

CHY vs. CICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHY has a 2.64% expense ratio, which is higher than CICVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHY vs. CICVX - Dividend Comparison

CHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.06%, less than CICVX's 9.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHY
Calamos Convertible and High Income Closed Fund
9.06%10.61%9.88%10.46%11.37%7.42%7.14%8.72%12.13%10.13%11.37%11.42%
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
9.97%12.51%1.83%2.48%0.94%15.90%7.74%1.39%16.75%4.55%3.43%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHY and CICVX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHY has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to CICVX (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHY dropped -60.53% vs CICVX's -49.33%.

CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHY and CICVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer