CHWY vs. PLMR
CHWY (Chewy, Inc.) and PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. CHWY operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while PLMR operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CHWY returned -23.04%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for PLMR. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CHWY vs. PLMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHWY achieves a -31.62% return, which is significantly lower than PLMR's -0.72% return.
CHWY
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 8.39%
- 6M
- -22.36%
- YTD
- -31.62%
- 1Y
- -37.06%
- 3Y*
- -12.35%
- 5Y*
- -23.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -6.32%
PLMR
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- 6M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 30.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CHWY Chewy, Inc. | $174.80M | $170.79M | $198.95M |
| $32.50M | $42.62M | $37.16M |
CHWY vs. PLMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHWY Chewy, Inc. | -31.62% | -1.31% | 41.73% | -36.27% | -37.12% | -34.40% | 209.97% | -19.44% |
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | -0.72% | 27.63% | 90.25% | 22.90% | -30.28% | -27.09% | 75.96% | 104.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHWY and PLMR is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CHWY and PLMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CHWY:
$9.36B
PLMR:
$3.55B
CHWY:
$0.47
PLMR:
$7.19
CHWY:
48.18
PLMR:
18.60
CHWY:
0.17
PLMR:
0.43
CHWY:
0.75
PLMR:
3.75
CHWY:
22.59
PLMR:
3.81
CHWY:
$12.75B
PLMR:
$977.99M
CHWY:
$3.79B
PLMR:
$401.29M
CHWY:
$330.60M
PLMR:
$210.26M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHWY vs. PLMR — Risk / Return Rank
CHWY
PLMR
CHWY vs. PLMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHWY | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.04 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 0.04 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 0.09 | -1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHWY vs. PLMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHWY drawdown since its inception was -87.37%, which is greater than PLMR's maximum drawdown of -62.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHWY and PLMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHWY | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.37% | -62.86% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.63% | -26.14% | -32.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.68% | -42.27% | -21.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.34% | -53.81% | -30.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.96% | -23.84% | -57.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.70% | -28.75% | -25.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.92% | 11.19% | +22.73% |
Volatility
CHWY vs. PLMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) is 12.82%, while Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) has a volatility of 14.09%. This indicates that CHWY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHWY | PLMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.82% | 14.09% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.29% | 27.13% | +10.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.31% | 38.46% | +9.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.70% | 43.04% | +17.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.98% | 47.89% | +13.09% |
Dividends
CHWY vs. PLMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHWY nor PLMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CHWY vs. PLMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chewy, Inc. and Palomar Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHWY vs. PLMR - Profitability Comparison
CHWY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chewy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 959.70M and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.4%.
PLMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CHWY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chewy, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.50M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
PLMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
CHWY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chewy, Inc. reported a net income of 39.20M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
PLMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palomar Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 42.95M and revenue of 278.94M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHWY and PLMR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLMR has higher volatility (14.09%) compared to CHWY (12.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHWY dropped -87.37% vs PLMR's -62.86%.
PLMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHWY and PLMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer