CHWY vs. PLMR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR).

Performance

CHWY vs. PLMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHWY vs. PLMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CHWY Chewy, Inc.	-18.31%	-1.31%	41.73%	-36.27%	-37.12%	-34.40%	209.97%	-17.12%
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc.	-11.32%	27.63%	90.25%	22.90%	-30.28%	-27.09%	75.96%	104.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CHWY : $11.45B PLMR : $3.26B
EPS CHWY : $0.00 PLMR : $7.17
PE Ratio CHWY : 51.60K PLMR : 16.66
PEG Ratio CHWY : 183.75 PLMR : 0.38
PS Ratio CHWY : 1.23 PLMR : 3.76
PB Ratio CHWY : 23.00K PLMR : 3.46
Total Revenue (TTM) CHWY : $9.34B PLMR : $873.68M
Gross Profit (TTM) CHWY : $2.80B PLMR : $490.74M
EBITDA (TTM) CHWY : $189.94M PLMR : $254.49M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHWY achieves a -18.31% return, which is significantly lower than PLMR's -11.32% return.

CHWY

• 1D: 4.33%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: -18.31%
• 6M: -33.25%
• 1Y: -16.95%
• 3Y*: -10.28%
• 5Y*: -20.06%
• 10Y*: —

PLMR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -3.40%
• YTD: -11.32%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: -12.82%
• 3Y*: 29.36%
• 5Y*: 11.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHWY vs. PLMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHWY

CHWY Risk / Return Rank: 28
CHWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CHWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CHWY Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CHWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CHWY Martin Ratio Rank: 33

PLMR

PLMR Risk / Return Rank: 29
PLMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PLMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PLMR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
PLMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
PLMR Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHWY vs. PLMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHWY	PLMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	-0.34	-0.03
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	-0.24	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.97	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	-0.34	+0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	-0.49	-0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHWY vs. PLMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHWY Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is comparable to the PLMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHWY and PLMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHWY	PLMR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.37	-0.34	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	0.28	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	0.63	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between CHWY and PLMR is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CHWY vs. PLMR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHWY nor PLMR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CHWY vs. PLMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHWY drawdown since its inception was -87.37%, which is greater than PLMR's maximum drawdown of -62.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHWY and PLMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHWY	PLMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.37%	-62.86%	-24.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.52%	-37.44%	-14.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.34%	-53.81%	-30.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.25%	-31.97%	-45.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.43%	-28.71%	-24.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.59%	25.68%	+1.91%

Volatility

CHWY vs. PLMR - Volatility Comparison

Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) has a higher volatility of 17.75% compared to Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) at 7.99%. This indicates that CHWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHWY	PLMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.75%	7.99%	+9.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.62%	23.50%	+7.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.78%	37.53%	+8.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.57%	42.68%	+17.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.53%	48.18%	+13.35%

Financials