PLMR vs. XLF
PLMR (Palomar Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Over the past 5 years, PLMR returned 6.92%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for XLF. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PLMR vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PLMR achieves a -24.74% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -6.64% return.
PLMR
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -12.23%
- YTD
- -24.74%
- 6M
- -14.04%
- 1Y
- -42.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.25%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- —
XLF
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 1.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
PLMR vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | -24.74% | 27.63% | 90.25% | 22.90% | -30.28% | -27.09% | 75.96% | 165.88% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -6.64% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 13.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between PLMR and XLF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PLMR vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
PLMR
XLF
PLMR vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PLMR | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.02 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.03 | 0.08 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 0.20 | -1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PLMR | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.17 | 0.08 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.41 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.20 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
PLMR vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PLMR drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLMR and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PLMR | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.86% | -82.69% | +19.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.96% | -14.79% | -26.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.27% | -15.54% | -26.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.81% | -25.81% | -28.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.27% | -9.34% | -32.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.80% | -20.03% | -8.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.84% | 5.66% | +23.18% |
Volatility
PLMR vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) has a higher volatility of 9.65% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 3.29%. This indicates that PLMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PLMR | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 3.29% | +6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.20% | 10.94% | +12.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.07% | 14.41% | +21.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.60% | 18.63% | +23.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.91% | 22.16% | +25.75% |
Dividends
PLMR vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
PLMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLMR Palomar Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.56% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PLMR and XLF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLMR has higher volatility (9.65%) compared to XLF (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLMR dropped -62.86% vs XLF's -82.69%.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PLMR and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer