CHUSX vs. MFWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Global Focus Fund (CHUSX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX).
CHUSX is managed by Alger. It was launched on Nov 2, 2003. MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
CHUSX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHUSX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHUSX Alger Global Focus Fund | -6.94% | 7.71% | 40.01% | 24.23% | -32.05% | 14.05% | 38.85% | 23.58% | -15.83% | 22.86% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | -0.47% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.96% | 15.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHUSX achieves a -6.94% return, which is significantly lower than MFWIX's -0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, CHUSX has outperformed MFWIX with an annualized return of 9.54%, while MFWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.19% annualized return.
CHUSX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -10.54%
- YTD
- -6.94%
- 6M
- -9.58%
- 1Y
- 9.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
MFWIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHUSX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHUSX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHUSX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank
CHUSX
MFWIX
CHUSX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Global Focus Fund (CHUSX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHUSX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 1.29 | -0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.77 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 1.59 | -1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | 6.26 | -4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHUSX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 1.29 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.52 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.71 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHUSX and MFWIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHUSX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison
CHUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, more than MFWIX's 8.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHUSX Alger Global Focus Fund | 9.63% | 8.97% | 32.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.87% | 0.00% | 2.77% | 9.32% | 4.03% | 1.01% | 0.00% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.81% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
CHUSX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHUSX drawdown since its inception was -69.31%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHUSX and MFWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHUSX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.31% | -33.01% | -36.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -6.85% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.48% | -20.22% | -21.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.48% | -23.36% | -18.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.05% | -6.50% | -5.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -3.83% | -14.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 1.74% | +1.81% |
Volatility
CHUSX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison
Alger Global Focus Fund (CHUSX) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 3.04%. This indicates that CHUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHUSX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 3.04% | +4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.47% | 5.25% | +9.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.68% | 8.85% | +12.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 9.09% | +13.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 9.60% | +11.50% |