CHTR vs. SMH
CHTR (Charter Communications, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, CHTR returned -4.76%/yr vs 33.99%/yr for SMH. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CHTR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHTR achieves a -30.97% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CHTR has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -4.76%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 33.99% annualized return.
CHTR
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- 6M
- -32.54%
- YTD
- -30.97%
- 1Y
- -45.56%
- 3Y*
- -29.93%
- 5Y*
- -28.48%
- 10Y*
- -4.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.91%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 1Y
- 92.69%
- 3Y*
- 53.04%
- 5Y*
- 32.99%
- 10Y*
- 33.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $554.96M | $408.40M | $474.70M | |
| $8.29B | $7.23B | $7.12B |
CHTR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | -30.97% | -39.10% | -11.81% | 14.62% | -47.99% | -1.45% | 36.38% | 70.22% | -15.18% | 16.69% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 51.46% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHTR and SMH is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010 | 0.28 |
The correlation between CHTR and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHTR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
CHTR
SMH
CHTR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHTR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.37 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 3.79 | -4.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 15.18 | -16.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHTR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHTR drawdown since its inception was -84.98%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHTR and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHTR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.98% | -84.96% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.39% | -24.62% | -31.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.94% | -35.74% | -37.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.98% | -45.30% | -39.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.98% | -45.30% | -39.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.45% | -18.46% | -63.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.23% | -40.89% | +19.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.31% | 6.13% | +25.18% |
Volatility
CHTR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) is 13.01%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that CHTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHTR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.01% | 14.15% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.25% | 32.94% | +11.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.68% | 38.50% | +9.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.93% | 36.51% | +3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 33.33% | +1.31% |
Dividends
CHTR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
CHTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHTR Charter Communications, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHTR and SMH have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to CHTR (13.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHTR dropped -84.98% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHTR and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer