CHRI vs. RSPG
CHRI (Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHRI is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Christian Values Screened Index, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CHRI charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.
Performance
CHRI vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHRI achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 25.57% return.
CHRI
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 25.57%
- 6M
- 25.75%
- 1Y
- 34.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
CHRI vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHRI Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF | 7.39% | 2.85% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 25.57% | 1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHRI and RSPG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHRI vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank
CHRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPG
CHRI vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF (CHRI) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHRI | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHRI vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHRI drawdown since its inception was -9.36%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRI and RSPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHRI | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -79.98% | +70.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -11.78% | +8.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -25.42% | +23.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility
CHRI vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHRI | RSPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 22.09% | -8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 28.25% | -14.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 33.53% | -19.70% |
CHRI vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHRI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHRI vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison
CHRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than RSPG's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRI Global X S&P 500 Christian Values ETF | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 2.11% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHRI and RSPG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHRI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHRI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.
RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.16% for CHRI.
CHRI is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. CHRI tracks S&P 500 Christian Values Screened Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for CHRI and 0.40% for RSPG.
Find the right allocation for CHRI and RSPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer