CHRG.L vs. MINV.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and MINV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHRG.L is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while MINV.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHRG.L returned 3.81%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for MINV.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHRG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MINV.L.

Performance

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRG.L achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 2.22% return.

CHRG.L

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -9.26%
• YTD: 23.07%
• 6M: 21.43%
• 1Y: 83.63%
• 3Y*: 12.82%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: —

MINV.L

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 2.22%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: 4.96%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: 6.13%
• 10Y*: 7.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc	23.07%	44.29%	-11.91%	-9.67%	-19.10%	14.89%	12,965.37%
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF	2.22%	3.37%	12.86%	1.50%	1.23%	15.98%	-3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CHRG.L and MINV.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2020	0.28

The correlation between CHRG.L and MINV.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHRG.L	MINV.L
Industrials	47.5%	8.9%
Basic Materials	21.8%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	14.6%	5.4%
Technology	8.5%	23.6%
Energy	6.2%	3.9%
Utilities	1.4%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	10.4%
Communication Services	-	11.1%
Financial Services	-	13.3%
Healthcare	-	14.0%
Real Estate	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHRG.L

CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

MINV.L

MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 19
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHRG.L	MINV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	0.62	+2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	0.96	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.11	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.23	0.78	+5.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	2.02	+16.18

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRG.L and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRG.L drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRG.L and MINV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHRG.L	MINV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.64%	-39.64%	-13.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.35%	-6.31%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.93%	-20.10%	-19.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.64%	-20.10%	-32.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.10%	-2.45%	-8.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.14%	-8.65%	-12.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	2.45%	+2.13%

Volatility

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 1.88%. This indicates that CHRG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHRG.L	MINV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	1.88%	+6.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.12%	5.97%	+14.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.36%	8.00%	+20.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.21%	16.98%	+9.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3,147.98%	15.23%	+3,132.75%

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHRG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHRG.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHRG.L nor MINV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHRG.L and MINV.L in my portfolio?

CHRG.L and MINV.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHRG.L or MINV.L?

On fees, MINV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHRG.L or MINV.L?

MINV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.

What is the main difference between CHRG.L and MINV.L?

CHRG.L is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while MINV.L is Global Equities. CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CHRG.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.