PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and HBGD.TO (Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHRG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index, while HBGD.TO is a Global Equities fund managed by Global X. Over the past 5 years, CHRG.L returned 6.01%/yr vs 59.16%/yr for HBGD.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHRG.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for HBGD.TO.

Performance

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CHRG.L is traded in GBp, while HBGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the HBGD.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHRG.L achieves a 34.75% return, which is significantly lower than HBGD.TO's 80.93% return.

CHRG.L

1D
-1.90%
1M
6.41%
YTD
34.75%
6M
34.20%
1Y
109.23%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
—

HBGD.TO

1D
-2.12%
1M
27.77%
YTD
80.93%
6M
82.74%
1Y
182.68%
3Y*
61.21%
5Y*
59.16%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc		34.75%44.29%-11.91%-9.67%-19.10%14.89%72.90%
HBGD.TO
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF		80.93%49.37%8.63%123.15%-54.97%384.03%116.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CHRG.L and HBGD.TO is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.42

The correlation between CHRG.L and HBGD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
CHRG.L
HBGD.TO

Industrials

48.7%

-

Basic Materials

20.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.5%

-

Technology

8.2%
68.7%

Energy

6.1%

-

Utilities

1.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Financial Services

-

24.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Industrials

CHRG.L
48.7%
HBGD.TO

-

Basic Materials

CHRG.L
20.3%
HBGD.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

CHRG.L
15.5%
HBGD.TO

-

Technology

CHRG.L
8.2%
HBGD.TO
68.7%

Energy

CHRG.L
6.1%
HBGD.TO

-

Utilities

CHRG.L
1.3%
HBGD.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

CHRG.L
0.0%
HBGD.TO

-

Communication Services

CHRG.L

-

HBGD.TO
2.0%

Financial Services

CHRG.L

-

HBGD.TO
24.9%

Healthcare

CHRG.L

-

HBGD.TO

-

Real Estate

CHRG.L

-

HBGD.TO
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc

Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF

Often compared with CHRG.L:
CHRG.L vs. BATG.LCHRG.L vs. HTWG.LCHRG.L vs. GBSP.LCHRG.L vs. BATT.LCHRG.L vs. FWRG.LCHRG.L vs. PHSP.LCHRG.L vs. 3USL.L
Often compared with HBGD.TO:
HBGD.TO vs. MTRX.TOHBGD.TO vs. CHPS-U.TOHBGD.TO vs. CHPS.TOHBGD.TO vs. SMHHBGD.TO vs. JPGL.LHBGD.TO vs. QYLDHBGD.TO vs. IQM

Return for Risk

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CHRG.L
CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO
HBGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HBGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) and Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CHRG.LHBGD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.08
4.86

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.86
4.91

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.63

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

8.36

-4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.77

26.03

-19.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the HBGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHRG.L and HBGD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CHRG.LHBGD.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

4.86

-2.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.62

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.74

+1.27

Drawdowns

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHRG.L drawdown since its inception was -52.64%, smaller than the maximum HBGD.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHRG.L and HBGD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CHRG.LHBGD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.64%

-100.00%

+47.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.68%

-21.99%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.46%

-39.26%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.64%

-62.45%

+9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-99.97%

+97.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-99.99%

+77.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.07%

7.05%

+9.02%

Volatility

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) is 10.38%, while Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that CHRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CHRG.LHBGD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.38%

12.99%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.04%

27.86%

-8.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.32%

37.83%

+14.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.08%

96.10%

-66.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.55%

87.25%

-57.70%

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHRG.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HBGD.TO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHRG.L vs. HBGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HBGD.TO
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF		0.21%0.39%0.53%0.64%1.22%0.83%0.32%1.52%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

CHRG.L and HBGD.TO have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHRG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHRG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for HBGD.TO.

CHRG.L is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while HBGD.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CHRG.L and 0.64% for HBGD.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHRG.L and HBGD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer