CHPY vs. XYLD
CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. CHPY is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 98.32% vs 17.35% for XYLD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
CHPY vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 63.11% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 7.24% return.
CHPY
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- 6M
- 49.62%
- YTD
- 63.11%
- 1Y
- 98.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
CHPY vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 63.11% | 56.76% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 7.24% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPY and XYLD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.65 |
The correlation between CHPY and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPY vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
CHPY
XYLD
CHPY vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.57 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.84 | 3.29 | +2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.10 | 17.16 | +5.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPY vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.93% | -33.46% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.93% | -5.29% | -11.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.93% | -0.10% | -16.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -3.69% | +1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 1.01% | +3.26% |
Volatility
CHPY vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 18.29% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.68%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.29% | 1.68% | +16.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.41% | 5.92% | +25.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.76% | 6.94% | +28.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.88% | 11.27% | +26.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.88% | 14.15% | +23.73% |
CHPY vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPY vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.41%, more than XYLD's 10.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 36.41% | 28.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.27% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPY and XYLD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPY has higher volatility (18.29%) compared to XYLD (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -16.93% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 98.32% vs 17.35% for XYLD. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 98.32% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.
CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 36.41%, compared with 10.27% for XYLD.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 0.60% for XYLD.
CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPY and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer