PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPY vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPY vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 63.11% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -1.59% return.


CHPY

1D
-4.40%
1M
-9.52%
6M
49.62%
YTD
63.11%
1Y
98.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTX

1D
-0.20%
1M
-3.45%
6M
-2.30%
YTD
-1.59%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPY vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and TLTX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPY vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTX
TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPY vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPYTLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.08

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.84

0.59

+5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.10

1.32

+21.78

CHPY vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the TLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and TLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -16.93%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPYTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.93%

-6.35%

-10.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.93%

-6.35%

-10.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.93%

-5.23%

-11.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-2.38%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

2.83%

+1.44%

Volatility

CHPY vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 18.29% compared to Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) at 2.87%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPYTLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.29%

2.87%

+15.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.41%

6.92%

+24.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.76%

9.24%

+26.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.88%

9.24%

+28.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.88%

9.24%

+28.64%

CHPY vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPY vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.41%, more than TLTX's 17.73% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHPY and TLTX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (18.29%) compared to TLTX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -16.93% vs TLTX's -6.35%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 98.32% vs 3.72% for TLTX. On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TLTX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 98.32% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 36.41%, compared with 17.73% for TLTX.

CHPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 0.29% for TLTX.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPY and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer