CHPY vs. RSBY
CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 118.25% vs 17.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. CHPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.
Performance
CHPY vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 79.25% return, which is significantly higher than RSBY's 18.52% return.
CHPY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 65.45%
- YTD
- 79.25%
- 1Y
- 118.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBY
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPY vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 79.25% | 56.76% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 18.52% | -8.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPY and RSBY is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPY vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank
CHPY
RSBY
CHPY vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPY | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.26 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.82 | 2.15 | +6.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.20 | 5.04 | +25.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPY vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -13.41%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and RSBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPY | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.41% | -23.32% | +9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -7.95% | -5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.72% | -6.45% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.35% | -13.35% | +11.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 3.39% | +0.52% |
Volatility
CHPY vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 19.50% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.15%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPY | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.50% | 3.15% | +16.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.55% | 8.37% | +22.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.97% | 11.41% | +23.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 13.37% | +24.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 13.37% | +24.15% |
CHPY vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPY vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison
CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.14%, more than RSBY's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 32.14% | 28.19% | 0.00% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.75% | 2.07% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPY and RSBY have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPY has higher volatility (19.50%) compared to RSBY (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -13.41% vs RSBY's -23.32%.
On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 118.25% vs 17.35% for RSBY. On fees, RSBY is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 118.25% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSBY is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.
CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 32.14%, compared with 1.75% for RSBY.
CHPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 0.98% for RSBY.
CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPY and RSBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer