CHPY vs. PLTW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 95.00% vs -28.95% for PLTW. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

CHPY vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 56.70% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -37.29% return.

CHPY

• 1D: 0.77%
• 1M: -10.41%
• 6M: 38.53%
• YTD: 56.70%
• 1Y: 95.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 96.22%

PLTW

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -4.02%
• 6M: -20.95%
• YTD: -37.29%
• 1Y: -28.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -13.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	$51.63M	$53.85M	$60.48M
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$2.58M	$2.73M	$3.69M

CHPY vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	56.70%	56.76%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-37.29%	116.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and PLTW is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

CHPY vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 6
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHPY vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPY	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	-0.46	+2.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	-0.32	+3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.96	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	-0.51	+3.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.85	-0.92	+16.77

CHPY vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPY	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.64%	-57.27%	+29.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.64%	-57.27%	+29.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.20%	-48.71%	+28.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.08%	-25.26%	+22.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.01%	31.63%	-25.62%

Volatility

CHPY vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 17.01% compared to PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) at 15.51%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPY	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.01%	15.51%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.89%	48.86%	-14.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.24%	62.65%	-24.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.09%	73.45%	-34.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.09%	73.45%	-34.36%

CHPY vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CHPY and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

CHPY vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.40%, less than PLTW's 137.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	38.40%	28.19%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	137.47%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPY and PLTW in my portfolio?

CHPY and PLTW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPY or PLTW?

CHPY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to PLTW (15.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -27.64% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, CHPY or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 95.00% vs -28.95% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, PLTW has been the lower-risk option at 15.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPY or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 95.00% return vs -28.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPY or PLTW?

CHPY and PLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPY or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 137.47%, compared with 38.40% for CHPY.

What is the main difference between CHPY and PLTW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.