CHPY vs. NVDW
CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 129.41% vs 51.10% for NVDW. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CHPY vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 73.28% return, which is significantly higher than NVDW's 12.02% return.
CHPY
- 1D
- 4.74%
- 1M
- 10.94%
- YTD
- 73.28%
- 6M
- 71.52%
- 1Y
- 129.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 51.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPY vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 73.28% | 39.20% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 12.02% | 33.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPY and NVDW is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CHPY and NVDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPY vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank
CHPY
NVDW
CHPY vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHPY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.22 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.70 | 2.01 | +8.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.58 | 4.84 | +34.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHPY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39 | 1.23 | +3.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.14 | 1.35 | +2.79 |
Drawdowns
CHPY vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and NVDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -25.54% | +13.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -25.54% | +13.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.73% | -13.69% | +6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -8.24% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 10.59% | -7.31% |
Volatility
CHPY vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) have volatilities of 15.72% and 15.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPY | NVDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.72% | 15.23% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.10% | 31.58% | -6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.71% | 41.74% | -12.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 41.59% | -7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 41.59% | -7.04% |
CHPY vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CHPY and NVDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CHPY vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison
CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.01%, less than NVDW's 61.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 30.01% | 28.19% |
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 61.31% | 38.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPY and NVDW have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPY has higher volatility (15.72%) compared to NVDW (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.17% vs NVDW's -25.54%.
On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 129.41% vs 51.10% for NVDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDW has been the lower-risk option at 15.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 129.41% return vs 51.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPY and NVDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.31%, compared with 30.01% for CHPY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.
CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.39 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPY and NVDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer