PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPY vs. NVDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPY vs. NVDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 73.28% return, which is significantly higher than NVDW's 12.02% return.


CHPY

1D
4.74%
1M
10.94%
YTD
73.28%
6M
71.52%
1Y
129.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDW

1D
1.74%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
12.02%
6M
12.57%
1Y
51.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPY vs. NVDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and NVDW is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.51

The correlation between CHPY and NVDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPY vs. NVDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPY vs. NVDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHPYNVDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.22

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.70

2.01

+8.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

39.58

4.84

+34.74

CHPY vs. NVDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 4.39, which is higher than the NVDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and NVDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHPYNVDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39

1.23

+3.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.14

1.35

+2.79

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. NVDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum NVDW drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and NVDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPYNVDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-25.54%

+13.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-25.54%

+13.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.73%

-13.69%

+6.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-8.24%

+6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

10.59%

-7.31%

Volatility

CHPY vs. NVDW - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) have volatilities of 15.72% and 15.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPYNVDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.72%

15.23%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.10%

31.58%

-6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.71%

41.74%

-12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.55%

41.59%

-7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.55%

41.59%

-7.04%

CHPY vs. NVDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CHPY and NVDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

CHPY vs. NVDW - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.01%, less than NVDW's 61.31% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHPY and NVDW have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (15.72%) compared to NVDW (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.17% vs NVDW's -25.54%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 129.41% vs 51.10% for NVDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDW has been the lower-risk option at 15.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 129.41% return vs 51.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPY and NVDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 61.31%, compared with 30.01% for CHPY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.39 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPY and NVDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer