CHPY vs. GOLI
CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and GOLI (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 94.78% vs 2.02% for GOLI. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CHPY vs. GOLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 60.59% return, which is significantly higher than GOLI's -10.95% return.
CHPY
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -16.49%
- 6M
- 45.51%
- YTD
- 60.59%
- 1Y
- 94.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 104.00%
GOLI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- 6M
- -14.97%
- YTD
- -10.95%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.96%
CHPY vs. GOLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 60.59% | 56.76% |
GOLI Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -10.95% | 15.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPY and GOLI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPY vs. GOLI — Risk / Return Rank
CHPY
GOLI
CHPY vs. GOLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPY | GOLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.04 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.22 | 0.08 | +5.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.81 | 0.23 | +20.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPY vs. GOLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -18.27%, smaller than the maximum GOLI drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and GOLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPY | GOLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.27% | -25.88% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.27% | -25.88% | +7.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.22% | -20.81% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -5.34% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 8.76% | -4.19% |
Volatility
CHPY vs. GOLI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 17.75% compared to Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GOLI) at 6.04%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPY | GOLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.75% | 6.04% | +11.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.44% | 23.44% | +8.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.88% | 25.17% | +10.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.81% | 23.17% | +14.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.81% | 23.17% | +14.64% |
CHPY vs. GOLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CHPY and GOLI have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CHPY vs. GOLI - Dividend Comparison
CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.46%, less than GOLI's 51.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 36.46% | 28.19% |
GOLI Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 51.33% | 37.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPY and GOLI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPY has higher volatility (17.75%) compared to GOLI (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -18.27% vs GOLI's -25.88%.
On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 94.78% vs 2.02% for GOLI. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, GOLI has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 94.78% return vs 2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPY and GOLI have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
GOLI has the higher dividend yield at 51.33%, compared with 36.46% for CHPY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Defiance.
CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPY and GOLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer