PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPY vs. COYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPY vs. COYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 56.70% return, which is significantly higher than COYY's -32.81% return.


CHPY

1D
0.77%
1M
-10.41%
6M
38.53%
YTD
56.70%
1Y
95.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
96.22%

COYY

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.64%
6M
-18.43%
YTD
-32.81%
1Y
-56.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-59.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.63M$53.85M$60.48M
$329.39K$314.09K$581.29K

CHPY vs. COYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and COYY is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPY vs. COYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

COYY
COYY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
COYY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
COYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COYY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHPY vs. COYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPYCOYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.65

+0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

-0.95

+4.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.85

-1.33

+17.18

CHPY vs. COYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the COYY Sharpe Ratio of -1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and COYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. COYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -27.64%, smaller than the maximum COYY drawdown of -60.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and COYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPYCOYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.64%

-60.85%

+33.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.64%

-59.62%

+31.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.20%

-60.44%

+40.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-38.98%

+35.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

42.51%

-36.50%

Volatility

CHPY vs. COYY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 17.01% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) at 5.35%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPYCOYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.01%

5.35%

+11.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.89%

18.39%

+15.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.24%

33.11%

+5.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.09%

34.04%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.09%

34.04%

+5.05%

CHPY vs. COYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than COYY's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPY vs. COYY - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.40%, less than COYY's 444.43% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHPY and COYY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to COYY (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -27.64% vs COYY's -60.85%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 95.00% vs -56.70% for COYY. On fees, CHPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, COYY has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 95.00% return vs -56.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.

COYY has the higher dividend yield at 444.43%, compared with 38.40% for CHPY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 1.07% for COYY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPY and COYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer