PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPY vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPY vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 85.77% return, which is significantly higher than CHAT's 74.30% return.


CHPY

1D
1.14%
1M
29.53%
YTD
85.77%
6M
85.49%
1Y
149.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHAT

1D
-0.66%
1M
27.78%
YTD
74.30%
6M
73.13%
1Y
144.01%
3Y*
55.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPY vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and CHAT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.80

The correlation between CHPY and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPY vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPY vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHPYCHATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.47

4.72

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.76

4.86

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.65

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.38

8.90

+3.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

47.28

26.26

+21.03

CHPY vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 5.47, which is comparable to the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHPYCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.47

4.72

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.83

1.98

+2.85

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPYCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-31.34%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.17%

-16.28%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.66%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-5.35%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

5.51%

-2.33%

Volatility

CHPY vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) have volatilities of 11.23% and 11.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPYCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.23%

11.70%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.33%

24.62%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.59%

30.74%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.17%

29.90%

+3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.17%

29.90%

+3.27%

CHPY vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPY vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.40%, more than CHAT's 1.64% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHPY and CHAT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHAT has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to CHPY (11.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.17% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 149.72% vs 144.01% for CHAT. On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CHPY has been the lower-risk option at 11.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 149.72% return vs 144.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.40%, compared with 1.64% for CHAT.

CHPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 0.75% for CHAT.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 4.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPY and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer