CHPY vs. BTCI
CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 149.72% vs -33.43% for BTCI. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CHPY vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 85.77% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -22.74% return.
CHPY
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 29.53%
- YTD
- 85.77%
- 6M
- 85.49%
- 1Y
- 149.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCI
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -16.29%
- YTD
- -22.74%
- 6M
- -26.41%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPY vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 85.77% | 62.91% |
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | -22.74% | 9.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPY and BTCI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPY vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank
CHPY
BTCI
CHPY vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHPY | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.47 | -0.86 | +6.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.76 | -1.14 | +6.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 0.87 | +0.94 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.38 | -0.75 | +13.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 47.28 | -1.34 | +48.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHPY | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.47 | -0.86 | +6.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.83 | -0.03 | +4.86 |
Drawdowns
CHPY vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -44.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and BTCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPY | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -44.98% | +32.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -44.98% | +32.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -42.87% | +42.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -15.18% | +13.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 25.05% | -21.87% |
Volatility
CHPY vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) at 8.35%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPY | BTCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 8.35% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 30.94% | -8.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.59% | 38.93% | -11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.17% | 40.11% | -6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.17% | 40.11% | -6.94% |
CHPY vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CHPY and BTCI have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CHPY vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison
CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.40%, less than BTCI's 43.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF | 43.16% | 36.46% | 6.76% |
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 28.40% | 28.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPY and BTCI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPY has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to BTCI (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.17% vs BTCI's -44.98%.
On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 149.72% vs -33.43% for BTCI. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 8.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 149.72% return vs -33.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPY and BTCI have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 43.16%, compared with 28.40% for CHPY.
CHPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Neos.
CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPY and BTCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer