CHPX vs. DOGG
CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) and DOGG (FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while DOGG is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by FT Vest. CHPX is passively managed, while DOGG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. CHPX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DOGG.
Performance
CHPX vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPX achieves a 73.85% return, which is significantly higher than DOGG's 9.21% return.
CHPX
- 1D
- -4.77%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- 6M
- 61.64%
- YTD
- 73.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOGG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPX vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 73.85% | 6.91% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 9.21% | 6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPX and DOGG is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPX vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank
CHPX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOGG
CHPX vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPX | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPX vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPX drawdown since its inception was -15.15%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPX and DOGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPX | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.15% | -11.19% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.33% | -4.01% | -10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -3.27% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.86% | — |
Volatility
CHPX vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPX | DOGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.72% | 11.02% | +32.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.72% | 12.99% | +30.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.72% | 12.99% | +30.73% |
CHPX vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPX vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison
CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than DOGG's 8.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF | 8.66% | 8.75% | 9.92% | 5.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPX and DOGG have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DOGG.
DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.66%, compared with 0.03% for CHPX.
CHPX is categorized as Semiconductors, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CHPX and 0.75% for DOGG.
Find the right allocation for CHPX and DOGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer