CHPS vs. UPGR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while UPGR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHPS returned 211.40% vs 73.35% for UPGR. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for UPGR.

Performance

CHPS vs. UPGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 103.69% return, which is significantly higher than UPGR's 23.29% return.

CHPS

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 23.46%
• YTD: 103.69%
• 6M: 107.58%
• 1Y: 211.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UPGR

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 11.33%
• YTD: 23.29%
• 6M: 17.90%
• 1Y: 73.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS vs. UPGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	103.69%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	23.29%	35.25%	-14.72%	-15.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and UPGR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.59

The correlation between CHPS and UPGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHPS vs. UPGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHPS	UPGR
Technology	98.8%	3.9%
Energy	0.5%	9.8%
Industrials	0.4%	51.4%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	10.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	12.2%

Return for Risk

CHPS vs. UPGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

UPGR

UPGR Risk / Return Rank: 70
UPGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UPGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
UPGR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
UPGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
UPGR Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS vs. UPGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPS	UPGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.17	2.44	+3.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.85	3.10	+2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.37	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.16	4.46	+7.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	47.22	10.94	+36.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHPS vs. UPGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 6.17, which is higher than the UPGR Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and UPGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPS	UPGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.17	2.44	+3.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	0.22	+1.55

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. UPGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, smaller than the maximum UPGR drawdown of -46.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and UPGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS	UPGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-46.60%	+7.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-16.55%	-0.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	-1.57%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.15%	-20.50%	+11.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.50%	6.73%	-2.23%

Volatility

CHPS vs. UPGR - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) at 10.77%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS	UPGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.07%	10.77%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.29%	20.38%	+7.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.50%	30.23%	+4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.78%	30.49%	+3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.78%	30.49%	+3.29%

CHPS vs. UPGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UPGR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS vs. UPGR - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than UPGR's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	0.27%	0.39%	1.16%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS and UPGR in my portfolio?

CHPS and UPGR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPS or UPGR?

CHPS has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to UPGR (10.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs UPGR's -46.60%.

Which ETF is better, CHPS or UPGR?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 211.40% vs 73.35% for UPGR. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UPGR has been the lower-risk option at 10.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPS or UPGR?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 211.40% return vs 73.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS or UPGR?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UPGR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPS or UPGR?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.27% for UPGR.

What is the main difference between CHPS and UPGR?

CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while UPGR is Energy Equities. CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.35% for UPGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.17 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.