CHPS vs. SGRT
CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund. CHPS is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
CHPS vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 104.33% return, which is significantly higher than SGRT's 44.22% return.
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 18.12%
- YTD
- 104.33%
- 6M
- 111.24%
- 1Y
- 202.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 44.22%
- 6M
- 48.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 104.33% | 36.44% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 44.22% | 26.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS and SGRT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS
SGRT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHPS vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -17.87% | -21.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -4.78% | +3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -3.24% | -5.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | — | — |
Volatility
CHPS vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.63% | 34.85% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.78% | 34.85% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.78% | 34.85% | -0.07% |
CHPS vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.33% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS and SGRT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.
CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for CHPS and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer