CHPS vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHPS returned 231.91% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

CHPS vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 127.70% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.31% return.

CHPS

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: 25.08%
• YTD: 127.70%
• 6M: 129.64%
• 1Y: 231.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	127.70%	50.10%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.31%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and RBIL is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

CHPS vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPS	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.03	4.18	+1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.43	6.39	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	2.06	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.35	7.59	+5.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	49.59	44.07	+5.52

CHPS vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 6.03, which is higher than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-0.52%	-38.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-0.52%	-16.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.51%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-0.07%	-9.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.70%	0.09%	+4.61%

Volatility

CHPS vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a higher volatility of 20.16% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that CHPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.16%	0.36%	+19.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.86%	0.85%	+32.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.78%	0.95%	+37.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.16%	1.07%	+34.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.16%	1.07%	+34.09%

CHPS vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CHPS vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.29%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS and RBIL in my portfolio?

CHPS and RBIL have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPS or RBIL?

CHPS has higher volatility (20.16%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, CHPS or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 231.91% vs 3.95% for RBIL. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPS or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 231.91% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS or RBIL?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPS or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.29% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between CHPS and RBIL?

CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.03 vs 4.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.