CHPS vs. AIPO
CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
CHPS vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 127.70% return, which is significantly higher than AIPO's 57.19% return.
CHPS
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 25.08%
- YTD
- 127.70%
- 6M
- 129.64%
- 1Y
- 231.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AIPO
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 7.45%
- YTD
- 57.19%
- 6M
- 53.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 127.70% | 35.92% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 57.19% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS and AIPO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.80 |
CHPS vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHPS
AIPO
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CHPS
AIPO
Energy
CHPS
AIPO
Industrials
CHPS
AIPO
Financial Services
CHPS
AIPO
Communication Services
CHPS
AIPO
Consumer Cyclical
CHPS
AIPO
-
Consumer Defensive
CHPS
AIPO
-
Basic Materials
CHPS
-
AIPO
-
Healthcare
CHPS
-
AIPO
-
Real Estate
CHPS
-
AIPO
Utilities
CHPS
-
AIPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS
AIPO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHPS vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.59 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -17.31% | -22.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -4.44% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.70% | — | — |
Volatility
CHPS vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.78% | 35.26% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.16% | 35.26% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.16% | 35.26% | -0.10% |
CHPS vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.29% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS and AIPO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while AIPO is Building & Construction. CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 0.69% for AIPO.
Find the right allocation for CHPS and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer