XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd (3800.HK).

XCHP.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NYSE Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2023.

Performance

XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd (3800.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XCHP.TO iShares Semiconductor Index ETF	13.74%	33.58%	21.73%	15.27%
3800.HK GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd	-11.75%	-6.51%	-4.94%	-13.55%

Different Trading Currencies

XCHP.TO is traded in CAD, while 3800.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 3800.HK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHP.TO achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly higher than 3800.HK's -11.75% return.

XCHP.TO

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 13.74%
• 6M: 22.22%
• 1Y: 77.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3800.HK

• 1D: 8.05%
• 1M: -18.66%
• YTD: -11.75%
• 6M: -29.60%
• 1Y: -7.49%
• 3Y*: -21.13%
• 5Y*: -11.12%
• 10Y*: -1.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHP.TO

XCHP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
XCHP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
XCHP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XCHP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
XCHP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

3800.HK

3800.HK Risk / Return Rank: 35
3800.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
3800.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
3800.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 36
3800.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
3800.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd (3800.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCHP.TO	3800.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	-0.13	+2.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	0.21	+2.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.03	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	-0.31	+2.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	-0.65	+9.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the 3800.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHP.TO and 3800.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCHP.TO	3800.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	-0.13	+2.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.02	+1.01

Correlation

The correlation between XCHP.TO and 3800.HK is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK - Dividend Comparison

XCHP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, while 3800.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XCHP.TO iShares Semiconductor Index ETF	0.37%	0.43%	0.29%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
3800.HK GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.84%	3.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	7.37%

Drawdowns

XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHP.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.95%, smaller than the maximum 3800.HK drawdown of -93.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHP.TO and 3800.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCHP.TO	3800.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.95%	-95.70%	+56.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.39%	-41.50%	+24.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-80.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-86.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.55%	-80.01%	+73.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.24%	-67.55%	+58.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.70%	18.75%	-12.05%

Volatility

XCHP.TO vs. 3800.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) is 12.71%, while GCL-Poly Energy Holdings Ltd (3800.HK) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that XCHP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3800.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCHP.TO	3800.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.71%	16.12%	-3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.42%	33.20%	-6.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.01%	57.00%	-15.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.21%	66.37%	-28.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.21%	68.42%	-30.21%