PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
10.64%33.58%21.73%15.27%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
13.72%51.20%17.00%15.84%
Different Trading Currencies

XCHP.TO is traded in CAD, while CHPS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHP.TO achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 13.72% return.


XCHP.TO

1D
5.96%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
10.64%
6M
21.29%
1Y
70.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPS

1D
5.72%
1M
-7.17%
YTD
13.72%
6M
33.01%
1Y
88.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHP.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XCHP.TO vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHP.TO
XCHP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCHP.TOCHPSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

2.39

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

2.91

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

5.14

-2.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.88

17.13

-8.25

XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHP.TO and CHPS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCHP.TOCHPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.39

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

1.10

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between XCHP.TO and CHPS is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

XCHP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than CHPS's 0.60% yield.


TTM202520242023
XCHP.TO
iShares Semiconductor Index ETF
0.39%0.43%0.29%0.17%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.60%0.68%1.75%0.36%

Drawdowns

XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHP.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.95%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -36.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHP.TO and CHPS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHP.TOCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.95%

-39.44%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.39%

-17.50%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.11%

-12.68%

+3.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-9.63%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.82%

4.98%

+1.84%

Volatility

XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) have volatilities of 13.40% and 13.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCHP.TOCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.40%

13.93%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.29%

26.03%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.94%

37.30%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.21%

31.93%

+6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.21%

31.93%

+6.28%