XCHP.TO vs. CHPS
XCHP.TO (iShares Semiconductor Index ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - XCHP.TO tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index while CHPS tracks the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XCHP.TO returned 174.83% vs 209.02% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCHP.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCHP.TO is traded in CAD, while CHPS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHP.TO achieves a 107.37% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 114.80% return.
XCHP.TO
- 1D
- -7.52%
- 1M
- 15.53%
- YTD
- 107.37%
- 6M
- 104.94%
- 1Y
- 174.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS
- 1D
- -8.86%
- 1M
- 17.30%
- YTD
- 114.80%
- 6M
- 115.69%
- 1Y
- 209.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCHP.TO iShares Semiconductor Index ETF | 107.37% | 32.93% | 21.39% | 15.07% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 114.71% | 51.23% | 16.87% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHP.TO and CHPS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XCHP.TO and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
XCHP.TO
CHPS
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCHP.TO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.68 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.37 | 12.91 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 42.02 | 45.65 | -3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHP.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.06%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -36.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHP.TO and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHP.TO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.06% | -36.74% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -16.30% | +2.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -8.86% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -8.06% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | 4.60% | -0.42% |
Volatility
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP.TO) is 19.98%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 23.02%. This indicates that XCHP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHP.TO | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.98% | 23.02% | -3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.53% | 34.57% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.04% | 40.04% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.01% | 35.82% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.01% | 35.82% | +2.19% |
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHP.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHP.TO vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
XCHP.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.31% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
XCHP.TO iShares Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, XCHP.TO and CHPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XCHP.TO.
XCHP.TO tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XCHP.TO and 0.15% for CHPS.
Find the right allocation for XCHP.TO and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer