CHPS.TO vs. UCSH-U.TO
CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and UCSH-U.TO (Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while UCSH-U.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. CHPS.TO is passively managed, while UCSH-U.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, CHPS.TO returned 77.14% vs 6.21% for UCSH-U.TO. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CHPS.TO vs. UCSH-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CHPS.TO is traded in CAD, while UCSH-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UCSH-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 47.72% return, which is significantly higher than UCSH-U.TO's 4.23% return.
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- 6M
- 32.50%
- YTD
- 47.72%
- 1Y
- 77.14%
- 3Y*
- 41.58%
- 5Y*
- 27.58%
- 10Y*
- —
UCSH-U.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- 6.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS.TO vs. UCSH-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 47.72% | 45.93% | 14.04% |
UCSH-U.TO Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF | 4.23% | -0.59% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS.TO and UCSH-U.TO is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS.TO vs. UCSH-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS.TO
UCSH-U.TO
CHPS.TO vs. UCSH-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF (UCSH-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS.TO | UCSH-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.19 | 1.65 | +3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.25 | 4.49 | +10.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS.TO vs. UCSH-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than UCSH-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and UCSH-U.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS.TO | UCSH-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.16% | -6.35% | -41.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.10% | -3.77% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.10% | -1.29% | -13.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.74% | -1.97% | -11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.11% | 1.38% | +3.73% |
Volatility
CHPS.TO vs. UCSH-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF (UCSH-U.TO) at 1.31%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCSH-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS.TO | UCSH-U.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.12% | 1.31% | +15.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.86% | 3.30% | +28.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.07% | 4.38% | +33.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.24% | 5.32% | +29.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.11% | 5.32% | +29.79% |
Dividends
CHPS.TO vs. UCSH-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than UCSH-U.TO's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% |
UCSH-U.TO Global X USD High Interest Savings ETF | 3.65% | 4.04% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS.TO and UCSH-U.TO have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while UCSH-U.TO is Money Market.
Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and UCSH-U.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer