CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and TECH.TO (Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while TECH.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHPS.TO returned 51.56%/yr vs 24.88%/yr for TECH.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHPS.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TECH.TO.

Performance

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 66.03% return, which is significantly higher than TECH.TO's 0.77% return.

CHPS.TO

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 28.67%
• YTD: 66.03%
• 6M: 59.28%
• 1Y: 134.35%
• 3Y*: 51.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TECH.TO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: -1.50%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 24.88%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	66.03%	45.93%	20.38%	68.20%	-37.86%	22.69%
TECH.TO Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD	0.77%	18.22%	40.26%	80.38%	-43.52%	14.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS.TO and TECH.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021	0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between CHPS.TO and TECH.TO has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHPS.TO	TECH.TO
Technology	100.0%	32.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	49.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	17.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS.TO

CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

TECH.TO

TECH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 24
TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TECH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
TECH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TECH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
TECH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPS.TO	TECH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.30	0.93	+3.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.53	1.43	+3.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.17	+0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.12	0.98	+9.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	30.54	3.13	+27.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is higher than the TECH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS.TO and TECH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPS.TO	TECH.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.30	0.93	+3.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.58	+0.33

Drawdowns

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, roughly equal to the maximum TECH.TO drawdown of -47.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and TECH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS.TO	TECH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.16%	-47.92%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.35%	-16.59%	+3.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.49%	-24.13%	-13.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.31%	+4.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.90%	-12.32%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.42%	5.17%	-0.75%

Volatility

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) at 4.24%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TECH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS.TO	TECH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.35%	4.24%	+7.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.81%	12.64%	+12.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.48%	17.45%	+14.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.79%	26.44%	+7.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.79%	26.37%	+7.42%

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than TECH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS.TO vs. TECH.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than TECH.TO's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.20%	0.53%	0.97%	0.01%
TECH.TO Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD	0.12%	0.12%	0.14%	0.20%	0.35%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS.TO and TECH.TO in my portfolio?

CHPS.TO and TECH.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHPS.TO or TECH.TO?

On fees, TECH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS.TO or TECH.TO?

TECH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.

What is the main difference between CHPS.TO and TECH.TO?

CHPS.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while TECH.TO is Technology Equities. CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while TECH.TO tracks Solactive FANGMA Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.40% for TECH.TO.