CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and SMAX.TO (Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while SMAX.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. CHPS.TO is passively managed, while SMAX.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, CHPS.TO returned 123.06% vs 35.90% for SMAX.TO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHPS.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SMAX.TO.
Performance
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 60.68% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX.TO's 14.89% return.
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 60.68%
- 6M
- 61.37%
- 1Y
- 123.06%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 35.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 60.68% | 45.93% | 20.38% | 28.61% |
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 14.89% | 13.56% | 34.57% | 6.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS.TO and SMAX.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CHPS.TO and SMAX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHPS.TO
SMAX.TO
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CHPS.TO
SMAX.TO
Basic Materials
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Communication Services
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Consumer Defensive
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Energy
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Financial Services
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Healthcare
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Industrials
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Real Estate
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Utilities
CHPS.TO
-
SMAX.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS.TO
SMAX.TO
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.54 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.12 | 4.79 | +4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.48 | 16.38 | +10.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than SMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and SMAX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.16% | -18.88% | -29.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.35% | -7.33% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.22% | -2.26% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -2.46% | -11.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 2.14% | +2.41% |
Volatility
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.67% compared to Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (SMAX.TO) at 6.14%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS.TO | SMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.67% | 6.14% | +9.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.93% | 10.10% | +17.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.16% | 12.58% | +21.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 14.62% | +19.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 14.62% | +19.88% |
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than SMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS.TO vs. SMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SMAX.TO's 9.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% |
SMAX.TO Hamilton U.S. Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 9.86% | 10.50% | 10.11% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS.TO and SMAX.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPS.TO is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPS.TO is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SMAX.TO.
CHPS.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while SMAX.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.65% for SMAX.TO.
Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and SMAX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer