CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and HXQ.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS.TO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while HXQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHPS.TO returned 25.57%/yr vs 16.73%/yr for HXQ.TO. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CHPS.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.
Performance
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 44.43% return, which is significantly higher than HXQ.TO's 14.56% return.
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- 6M
- 32.24%
- YTD
- 44.43%
- 1Y
- 75.11%
- 3Y*
- 40.71%
- 5Y*
- 25.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.08%
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- 6M
- 12.81%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.20%
- 5Y*
- 16.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$6.23M | CA$6.24M | CA$7.42M | |
| CA$2.97M | CA$3.02M | CA$3.91M |
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 44.43% | 45.93% | 20.38% | 68.20% | -37.86% | 23.13% |
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF | 14.56% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 18.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHPS.TO
HXQ.TO
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CHPS.TO
HXQ.TO
Basic Materials
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Communication Services
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Energy
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Financial Services
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Healthcare
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Industrials
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Real Estate
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Utilities
CHPS.TO
-
HXQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS.TO
HXQ.TO
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.23 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.90 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.18 | 5.49 | +6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than HXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.16% | -31.60% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.71% | -12.43% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.49% | -22.58% | -14.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.16% | -31.60% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.00% | -7.80% | -9.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -5.72% | -8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 4.30% | +1.66% |
Volatility
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) at 6.71%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.23% | 6.71% | +7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.34% | 15.67% | +17.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.46% | 18.98% | +20.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.50% | 21.29% | +14.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.33% | 21.07% | +14.26% |
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% |
HXQ.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.
CHPS.TO is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer