PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 44.43% return, which is significantly higher than HXQ.TO's 14.56% return.


CHPS.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
-10.50%
6M
32.24%
YTD
44.43%
1Y
75.11%
3Y*
40.71%
5Y*
25.57%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.08%

HXQ.TO

1D
0.69%
1M
-5.98%
6M
12.81%
YTD
14.56%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
24.20%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
21.14%
ALL TIME*
21.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$6.23MCA$6.24MCA$7.42M
CA$2.97MCA$3.02MCA$3.91M

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
44.43%45.93%20.38%68.20%-37.86%23.13%
HXQ.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF
14.56%15.05%35.98%51.16%-27.84%18.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021

0.80

The correlation between CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHPS.TO
HXQ.TO

Technology

100.0%
55.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.4%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

4.4%

Industrials

-

3.1%

Real Estate

-

0.2%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

CHPS.TO
100.0%
HXQ.TO
55.9%

Basic Materials

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
1.0%

Communication Services

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
4.4%

Energy

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
0.5%

Financial Services

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
0.3%

Healthcare

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
4.4%

Industrials

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
3.1%

Real Estate

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
0.2%

Utilities

CHPS.TO

-

HXQ.TO
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HXQ.TO
HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPS.TOHXQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

1.90

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.18

5.49

+6.69

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than HXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPS.TOHXQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.16%

-31.60%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.71%

-12.43%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.49%

-22.58%

-14.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.16%

-31.60%

-16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.00%

-7.80%

-9.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.75%

-5.72%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

4.30%

+1.66%

Volatility

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXQ.TO) at 6.71%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPS.TOHXQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.23%

6.71%

+7.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.34%

15.67%

+17.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.46%

18.98%

+20.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.50%

21.29%

+14.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.33%

21.07%

+14.26%

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPS.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%
HXQ.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.

CHPS.TO is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while HXQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while HXQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and HXQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer