CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO
CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and HXH.TO (Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while HXH.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHPS.TO returned 47.55%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for HXH.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHPS.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for HXH.TO.
Performance
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 60.68% return, which is significantly higher than HXH.TO's 22.45% return.
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 13.58%
- YTD
- 60.68%
- 6M
- 61.37%
- 1Y
- 123.06%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HXH.TO
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 22.45%
- 6M
- 23.40%
- 1Y
- 42.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 16.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 60.68% | 45.93% | 20.38% | 68.20% | -37.86% | 23.13% |
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 22.45% | 25.86% | 15.24% | 6.33% | 5.00% | 8.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS.TO and HXH.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CHPS.TO and HXH.TO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHPS.TO
HXH.TO
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CHPS.TO
HXH.TO
-
Basic Materials
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Communication Services
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Energy
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Financial Services
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Healthcare
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Industrials
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Real Estate
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
Utilities
CHPS.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS.TO
HXH.TO
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 2.14 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.12 | 17.31 | -8.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.48 | 53.84 | -27.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than HXH.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and HXH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.16% | -40.80% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.35% | -2.52% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.49% | -10.55% | -26.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.22% | 0.00% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -4.85% | -9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 0.81% | +3.74% |
Volatility
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.67% compared to Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) at 2.78%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.67% | 2.78% | +12.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.93% | 6.77% | +21.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.16% | 8.25% | +25.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 12.20% | +22.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 16.06% | +18.44% |
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than HXH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS.TO vs. HXH.TO - Dividend Comparison
CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while HXH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% |
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS.TO and HXH.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.
CHPS.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while HXH.TO is Canada Equities. CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while HXH.TO tracks Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.11% for HXH.TO.
Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and HXH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer