PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 60.68% return, which is significantly higher than HDIV.TO's 17.07% return.


CHPS.TO

1D
1.86%
1M
13.58%
YTD
60.68%
6M
61.37%
1Y
123.06%
3Y*
47.55%
5Y*
10Y*

HDIV.TO

1D
1.08%
1M
3.72%
YTD
17.07%
6M
17.58%
1Y
45.74%
3Y*
27.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
60.68%45.93%20.38%68.20%-37.86%22.98%
HDIV.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF
17.07%33.87%23.15%13.91%-2.53%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS.TO and HDIV.TO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021

0.58

The correlation between CHPS.TO and HDIV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHPS.TO
HDIV.TO

Technology

100.0%
9.5%

Basic Materials

-

13.4%

Communication Services

-

6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

18.4%

Financial Services

-

39.8%

Healthcare

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

3.0%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Utilities

-

4.7%

Technology

CHPS.TO
100.0%
HDIV.TO
9.5%

Basic Materials

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
13.4%

Communication Services

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
0.3%

Energy

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
18.4%

Financial Services

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
39.8%

Healthcare

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
0.2%

Industrials

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
3.0%

Real Estate

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
2.1%

Utilities

CHPS.TO

-

HDIV.TO
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HDIV.TO
HDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPS.TOHDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.65

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.12

5.23

+3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.48

25.02

+1.46

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is comparable to the HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS.TO and HDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than HDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and HDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPS.TOHDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.16%

-22.32%

-25.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-8.73%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.49%

-14.58%

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-0.13%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-4.21%

-9.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

1.82%

+2.73%

Volatility

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.67% compared to Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) at 4.51%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPS.TOHDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.67%

4.51%

+11.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.93%

10.74%

+17.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.16%

12.86%

+21.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.50%

15.64%

+18.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.50%

15.64%

+18.86%

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than HDIV.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPS.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than HDIV.TO's 9.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%
HDIV.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Covered Call ETF
9.27%10.09%11.38%10.41%9.64%3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHPS.TO and HDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.

CHPS.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while HDIV.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Hamilton ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.00% for HDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and HDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer