PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF (DLR-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CHPS.TO is traded in CAD, while DLR-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DLR-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 47.72% return, which is significantly higher than DLR-U.TO's 3.52% return.


CHPS.TO

1D
-2.37%
1M
-10.36%
6M
32.50%
YTD
47.72%
1Y
77.14%
3Y*
41.58%
5Y*
27.58%
10Y*

DLR-U.TO

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.39%
6M
1.98%
YTD
3.52%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
2.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
47.72%45.93%20.38%68.20%-37.86%23.13%
DLR-U.TO
Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF
3.52%-1.48%12.94%1.49%7.61%2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS.TO and DLR-U.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DLR-U.TO
DLR-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DLR-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLR-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLR-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DLR-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLR-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF (DLR-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHPS.TODLR-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.19

1.35

+3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.25

3.38

+11.87

CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the DLR-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS.TO and DLR-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than DLR-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and DLR-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPS.TODLR-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.16%

-17.30%

-30.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-3.88%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.49%

-6.58%

-30.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.16%

-6.58%

-41.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.10%

-1.50%

-13.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.74%

-6.35%

-7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

1.55%

+3.56%

Volatility

CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF (DLR-U.TO) at 1.36%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLR-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPS.TODLR-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.12%

1.36%

+15.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.86%

3.38%

+28.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.07%

4.43%

+33.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.24%

6.27%

+28.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.11%

6.63%

+28.48%

Dividends

CHPS.TO vs. DLR-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than DLR-U.TO's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%0.00%0.00%
DLR-U.TO
Global X U.S. Dollar Currency ETF
3.73%3.30%3.36%4.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHPS.TO and DLR-U.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPS.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while DLR-U.TO is Currency.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and DLR-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer