PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CHPS-U.TO is traded in USD, while RBOT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RBOT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS-U.TO achieves a 62.87% return, which is significantly higher than RBOT.TO's 8.39% return.


CHPS-U.TO

1D
1.13%
1M
25.87%
YTD
62.87%
6M
61.65%
1Y
135.95%
3Y*
49.75%
5Y*
10Y*

RBOT.TO

1D
-1.42%
1M
2.65%
YTD
8.39%
6M
13.11%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
-1.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CHPS-U.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
62.87%51.84%11.58%75.77%-43.11%-2.63%
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF
8.39%13.64%4.19%39.90%-47.74%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS-U.TO and RBOT.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS-U.TO
CHPS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RBOT.TO
RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHPS-U.TORBOT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.92

0.99

+2.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.35

1.54

+2.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.18

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.46

1.21

+9.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

32.71

4.10

+28.61

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is higher than the RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS-U.TO and RBOT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHPS-U.TORBOT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92

0.99

+2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.15

+0.41

Drawdowns

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, smaller than the maximum RBOT.TO drawdown of -60.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS-U.TO and RBOT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPS-U.TORBOT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-60.92%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-20.20%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.79%

-31.26%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.86%

+16.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.60%

-26.28%

+8.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

5.96%

-1.79%

Volatility

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) at 8.56%. This indicates that CHPS-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBOT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPS-U.TORBOT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.79%

8.56%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.57%

19.24%

+8.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.90%

24.78%

+10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.32%

28.51%

+10.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.32%

28.14%

+11.18%

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS-U.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than RBOT.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPS-U.TO vs. RBOT.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CHPS-U.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.00%0.01%0.14%0.40%0.72%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF
0.12%0.14%0.85%0.11%0.52%0.04%0.17%0.67%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHPS-U.TO and RBOT.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHPS-U.TO is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHPS-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

CHPS-U.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while RBOT.TO is Robotics. CHPS-U.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while RBOT.TO tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS-U.TO and 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPS-U.TO and RBOT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer