PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHIQ vs. CWST
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHIQ vs. CWST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHIQ vs. CWST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
-6.51%13.69%10.74%-10.70%-22.01%-27.07%92.61%44.19%-28.65%67.74%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
-18.99%-7.44%23.81%7.75%-7.15%37.89%34.59%61.57%23.76%85.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly higher than CWST's -18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has underperformed CWST with an annualized return of 7.29%, while CWST has yielded a comparatively higher 27.85% annualized return.


CHIQ

1D
3.43%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-6.51%
6M
-17.09%
1Y
-9.66%
3Y*
1.64%
5Y*
-9.04%
10Y*
7.29%

CWST

1D
1.22%
1M
-14.83%
YTD
-18.99%
6M
-16.38%
1Y
-28.85%
3Y*
-1.36%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
27.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHIQ vs. CWST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIQ
CHIQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CHIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CHIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CWST
CWST Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CWST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWST Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CWST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWST Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIQ vs. CWST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHIQCWSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.36

-0.93

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.32

-1.23

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.85

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

-0.75

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.02

-1.55

+0.53

CHIQ vs. CWST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is higher than the CWST Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIQ and CWST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHIQCWSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

-0.93

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.15

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.91

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.09

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between CHIQ and CWST is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CHIQ vs. CWST - Dividend Comparison

CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while CWST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
1.58%1.48%2.65%2.26%0.38%0.00%0.11%1.05%2.71%0.62%1.51%4.86%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CHIQ vs. CWST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, smaller than the maximum CWST drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and CWST.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHIQCWSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.04%

-98.52%

+31.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.18%

-37.72%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.95%

-37.72%

-22.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.04%

-37.72%

-29.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.95%

-34.09%

-16.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.39%

-53.18%

+22.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.58%

18.32%

-8.74%

Volatility

CHIQ vs. CWST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 8.38%, while Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) has a volatility of 14.69%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHIQCWSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

14.69%

-6.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

24.61%

-8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.25%

31.04%

-3.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.80%

26.14%

+11.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.40%

30.59%

+1.81%