CHIQ vs. CWST
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST).
CHIQ is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2009.
Performance
CHIQ vs. CWST - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHIQ vs. CWST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -6.51% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | -18.99% | -7.44% | 23.81% | 7.75% | -7.15% | 37.89% | 34.59% | 61.57% | 23.76% | 85.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly higher than CWST's -18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIQ has underperformed CWST with an annualized return of 7.29%, while CWST has yielded a comparatively higher 27.85% annualized return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -17.09%
- 1Y
- -9.66%
- 3Y*
- 1.64%
- 5Y*
- -9.04%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
CWST
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -14.83%
- YTD
- -18.99%
- 6M
- -16.38%
- 1Y
- -28.85%
- 3Y*
- -1.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- 27.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. CWST — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
CWST
CHIQ vs. CWST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIQ | CWST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | -0.93 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | -1.23 | +0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.85 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | -0.75 | +0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | -1.55 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIQ | CWST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | -0.93 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.15 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.91 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and CWST is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. CWST - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while CWST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.58% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
CWST Casella Waste Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. CWST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, smaller than the maximum CWST drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and CWST.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | CWST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -98.52% | +31.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.18% | -37.72% | +16.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.95% | -37.72% | -22.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | -37.72% | -29.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.95% | -34.09% | -16.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.39% | -53.18% | +22.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.58% | 18.32% | -8.74% |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. CWST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 8.38%, while Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) has a volatility of 14.69%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | CWST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.38% | 14.69% | -6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.59% | 24.61% | -8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.25% | 31.04% | -3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.80% | 26.14% | +11.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.40% | 30.59% | +1.81% |