CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

CHIN.L (ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF) and CNAA.L (Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR) are both China Equities funds - CHIN.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD while CNAA.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHIN.L returned -1.65%/yr vs -0.85%/yr for CNAA.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHIN.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAA.L.

Performance

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHIN.L achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than CNAA.L's 6.72% return.

CHIN.L

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -2.50%
• 6M: -1.54%
• YTD: 2.44%
• 1Y: 21.00%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: -1.65%
• 10Y*: —

CNAA.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -2.75%
• 6M: 3.62%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 1Y: 28.12%
• 3Y*: 10.03%
• 5Y*: -0.85%
• 10Y*: 4.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF	2.44%	32.60%	14.52%	-13.55%	-25.21%	-9.74%	34.99%	27.63%	-22.79%	43.34%
CNAA.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR	6.72%	26.12%	10.92%	-14.19%	-25.98%	3.21%	42.78%	36.86%	-30.39%	22.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CHIN.L and CNAA.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2016	0.83

The correlation between CHIN.L and CNAA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHIN.L	CNAA.L
Technology	25.9%	33.2%
Financial Services	14.7%	16.8%
Industrials	14.6%	17.4%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	4.8%
Basic Materials	10.6%	10.2%
Communication Services	6.3%	0.5%
Healthcare	5.7%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	6.0%
Utilities	2.4%	2.9%
Energy	2.4%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.6%

Return for Risk

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHIN.L

CHIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 40
CHIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CHIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CHIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CHIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CHIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CNAA.L

CNAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
CNAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CNAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CNAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
CNAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CNAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHIN.L	CNAA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	1.47	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	2.09	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.26	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.58	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.26	9.38	-4.12

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the CNAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHIN.L and CNAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHIN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.88%, roughly equal to the maximum CNAA.L drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.L and CNAA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHIN.L	CNAA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.88%	-56.07%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-7.83%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.03%	-28.67%	+4.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.37%	-44.54%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.87%	-15.96%	-6.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.38%	-32.78%	+8.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	2.99%	+1.00%

Volatility

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) is 6.60%, while Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that CHIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHIN.L	CNAA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.60%	8.62%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.43%	14.80%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.63%	19.08%	+0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.54%	22.74%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.03%	22.58%	+0.45%

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHIN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CNAA.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHIN.L vs. CNAA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHIN.L nor CNAA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	1.01%	1.19%	2.38%
CNAA.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHIN.L and CNAA.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, CHIN.L and CNAA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CHIN.L or CNAA.L?

On fees, CNAA.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHIN.L or CNAA.L?

CNAA.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.L.

What is the main difference between CHIN.L and CNAA.L?

CHIN.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while CNAA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: ICBC Credit Suisse Asset Management and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CHIN.L and 0.35% for CNAA.L.