CHIN.L vs. C300.L
CHIN.L (ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF) and C300.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds - CHIN.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD while C300.L tracks the S&P China A 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHIN.L returned 13.58%/yr vs 16.88%/yr for C300.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHIN.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for C300.L.
Performance
CHIN.L vs. C300.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIN.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than C300.L's 14.60% return.
CHIN.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 5.71%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- -1.79%
- 10Y*
- —
C300.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 49.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.L vs. C300.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF | 5.71% | 32.57% | 14.56% | -13.55% | 2.48% |
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 14.60% | 33.78% | 14.79% | -11.81% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIN.L and C300.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CHIN.L and C300.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIN.L vs. C300.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHIN.L
C300.L
CHIN.L vs. C300.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIN.L | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.51 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 7.23 | -3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.75 | 22.19 | -13.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIN.L | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.88 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.54 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
CHIN.L vs. C300.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIN.L drawdown since its inception was -55.89%, which is greater than C300.L's maximum drawdown of -31.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.L and C300.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIN.L | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.89% | -31.77% | -24.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -6.83% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -28.06% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.39% | -1.64% | -18.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.71% | -14.09% | -10.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.23% | +1.13% |
Volatility
CHIN.L vs. C300.L - Volatility Comparison
ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF (CHIN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) at 6.07%. This indicates that CHIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C300.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIN.L | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 6.07% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 12.12% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 17.15% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.43% | 22.07% | +2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 22.07% | +0.76% |
CHIN.L vs. C300.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIN.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than C300.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIN.L vs. C300.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHIN.L nor C300.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHIN.L ICBC Credit Suisse UCITS ETF SICAV - ICBCCS WisdomTree S&P China 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIN.L and C300.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C300.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C300.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.L.
CHIN.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while C300.L tracks S&P China A 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: ICBC Credit Suisse Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CHIN.L and 0.35% for C300.L.
Find the right allocation for CHIN.L and C300.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer