CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE
CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) and M9SV.DE (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR) are both China Equities funds - CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index while M9SV.DE tracks the STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHIN.DE returned 22.89% vs 0.43% for M9SV.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHIN.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for M9SV.DE.
Performance
CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIN.DE achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than M9SV.DE's -4.50% return.
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 22.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
M9SV.DE
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- 6M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 4.90% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -7.05% |
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | -4.50% | -5.32% | 37.47% | -4.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIN.DE and M9SV.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CHIN.DE and M9SV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CHIN.DE
M9SV.DE
CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) and Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIN.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.03 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 0.18 | +2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.40 | 0.41 | +5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, roughly equal to the maximum M9SV.DE drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.DE and M9SV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIN.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -23.79% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -7.48% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.68% | -17.81% | +13.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -9.52% | +1.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.21% | +0.38% |
Volatility
CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) at 3.73%. This indicates that CHIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than M9SV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIN.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 3.73% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.39% | 7.51% | +5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 11.20% | +7.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 20.43% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.47% | 21.49% | +0.98% |
CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than M9SV.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIN.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHIN.DE nor M9SV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIN.DE and M9SV.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, M9SV.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
M9SV.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index, while M9SV.DE tracks STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Market Access. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CHIN.DE and 0.45% for M9SV.DE.
Find the right allocation for CHIN.DE and M9SV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer