CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE
CHIN.DE (KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD) and FLXC.DE (Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - CHIN.DE tracks the S&P China 500 Index while FLXC.DE tracks the FTSE China 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CHIN.DE returned 26.49% vs 4.53% for FLXC.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHIN.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXC.DE.
Performance
CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIN.DE achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than FLXC.DE's -5.94% return.
CHIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 26.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLXC.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -5.94%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 7.94%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIN.DE KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD | 6.22% | 16.60% | 23.10% | -6.61% |
FLXC.DE Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF | -5.94% | 17.34% | 27.28% | -7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIN.DE and FLXC.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between CHIN.DE and FLXC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CHIN.DE
FLXC.DE
CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) and Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIN.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.06 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 0.31 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 0.64 | +7.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIN.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 0.27 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.09 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum FLXC.DE drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIN.DE and FLXC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIN.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -55.61% | +32.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -15.19% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -30.89% | +27.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -27.95% | +20.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 7.38% | -4.09% |
Volatility
CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares ICBCCS S&P China 500 Index UCITS ETF USD (CHIN.DE) is 6.18%, while Franklin FTSE China UCITS ETF (FLXC.DE) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that CHIN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIN.DE | FLXC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 6.78% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 12.35% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.09% | 17.78% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 26.71% | -4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 26.20% | -3.79% |
CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIN.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIN.DE vs. FLXC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHIN.DE nor FLXC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIN.DE and FLXC.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CHIN.DE.
CHIN.DE tracks S&P China 500 Index, while FLXC.DE tracks FTSE China 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CHIN.DE and 0.19% for FLXC.DE.
Find the right allocation for CHIN.DE and FLXC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer