CHIAX vs. PLFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX).
CHIAX is managed by Credit Suisse. It was launched on Mar 7, 1999. PLFRX is managed by Pacific Funds Series Trust. It was launched on Jun 29, 2011.
Performance
CHIAX vs. PLFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHIAX vs. PLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIAX Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund | -0.99% | 4.25% | 6.85% | 11.03% | -3.14% | 5.03% | 2.32% | 6.67% | -0.22% | 4.33% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | -1.34% | 6.68% | 8.38% | 13.94% | -2.01% | 4.36% | 1.26% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 4.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIAX achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly higher than PLFRX's -1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CHIAX has underperformed PLFRX with an annualized return of 4.36%, while PLFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.04% annualized return.
CHIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- -0.37%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.87%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
PLFRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHIAX vs. PLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIAX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PLFRX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHIAX vs. PLFRX — Risk / Return Rank
CHIAX
PLFRX
CHIAX vs. PLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHIAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.96 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 3.42 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.61 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.90 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.58 | 9.49 | -3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHIAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.96 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.51 | 2.05 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIAX and PLFRX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CHIAX vs. PLFRX - Dividend Comparison
CHIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, which matches PLFRX's 6.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIAX Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.65% | 7.44% | 7.25% | 7.19% | 3.90% | 3.38% | 4.19% | 4.94% | 4.38% | 3.79% | 4.47% | 4.26% |
PLFRX Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income | 6.59% | 7.18% | 8.47% | 8.92% | 4.39% | 3.65% | 3.68% | 5.10% | 5.03% | 4.46% | 4.21% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
CHIAX vs. PLFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIAX drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than PLFRX's maximum drawdown of -18.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIAX and PLFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.29% | -18.75% | -18.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.92% | -1.82% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.99% | -6.44% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.94% | -18.75% | -1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -1.55% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -0.73% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.56% | +0.05% |
Volatility
CHIAX vs. PLFRX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund (CHIAX) and Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income (PLFRX) have volatilities of 0.76% and 0.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHIAX | PLFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.74% | 1.79% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77% | 2.76% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 2.74% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.57% | 3.75% | -0.18% |