PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHI vs. CICVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHI vs. CICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHI achieves a 25.35% return, which is significantly higher than CICVX's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CHI has outperformed CICVX with an annualized return of 12.23%, while CICVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.45% annualized return.


CHI

1D
1.21%
1M
-3.44%
6M
16.98%
YTD
25.35%
1Y
35.42%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
12.23%
ALL TIME*
9.73%

CICVX

1D
3.16%
1M
-3.18%
6M
11.47%
YTD
17.72%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.29M$2.24M$2.26M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CHI vs. CICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHI
Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund
25.35%-2.15%27.23%9.49%-23.31%20.31%33.82%35.66%-12.67%22.70%
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
17.72%19.03%9.94%10.95%-21.02%5.36%48.84%19.51%0.59%14.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CHI and CICVX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2002

0.50

Over the past year, CHI and CICVX have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHI vs. CICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CHI
CHI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHI Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CICVX
CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CHI vs. CICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHICICVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.73

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.72

10.26

+1.46

CHI vs. CICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the CICVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHI and CICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHI vs. CICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHI drawdown since its inception was -64.72%, which is greater than CICVX's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI and CICVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHICICVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.72%

-49.33%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-10.15%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.52%

-14.79%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.03%

-27.17%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.64%

-27.17%

-22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.10%

-7.31%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-17.40%

+7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

2.69%

+0.27%

Volatility

CHI vs. CICVX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI) has a higher volatility of 6.95% compared to Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) at 6.18%. This indicates that CHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHICICVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

6.18%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

14.15%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

17.06%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.33%

13.39%

+6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.27%

13.12%

+10.15%

CHI vs. CICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHI has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CICVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHI vs. CICVX - Dividend Comparison

CHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, less than CICVX's 10.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHI
Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund
9.10%10.88%9.55%11.00%10.85%7.54%6.75%8.49%12.19%10.19%11.30%11.50%
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
10.59%12.51%1.83%2.48%0.94%15.90%7.74%1.39%16.75%4.55%3.43%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHI and CICVX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHI has higher volatility (6.95%) compared to CICVX (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHI dropped -64.72% vs CICVX's -49.33%.

CHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHI and CICVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer