PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CHF 10,000 investment in iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH) (CHDVD.SW) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CHDVD.SW is traded in CHF, while BNDW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BNDW values have been converted to CHF using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHDVD.SW achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than BNDW's 0.74% return.


CHDVD.SW

1D
0.86%
1M
0.63%
YTD
1.10%
6M
4.21%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
9.56%

BNDW

1D
0.21%
1M
2.45%
YTD
0.74%
6M
-0.70%
1Y
0.40%
3Y*
-0.25%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CHDVD.SW
iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH)
1.10%18.82%8.79%9.62%-10.54%23.80%4.19%34.20%-4.20%
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
0.74%-8.24%10.49%-2.41%-11.69%0.79%-2.74%6.53%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CHDVD.SW and BNDW is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2018

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHDVD.SW
CHDVD.SW Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CHDVD.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHDVD.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHDVD.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CHDVD.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHDVD.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDW
BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH) (CHDVD.SW) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHDVD.SWBNDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.02

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.07

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

0.17

+2.39

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHDVD.SW Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the BNDW Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHDVD.SW and BNDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHDVD.SWBNDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.06

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

-0.27

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

-0.09

+0.65

Drawdowns

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHDVD.SW drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -20.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDVD.SW and BNDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHDVD.SWBNDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.09%

-20.97%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-5.90%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-12.90%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.08%

-18.50%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

-17.26%

+13.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-9.80%

+5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.31%

+0.71%

Volatility

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison

iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH) (CHDVD.SW) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) at 1.34%. This indicates that CHDVD.SW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHDVD.SWBNDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

1.34%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

5.54%

+3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.75%

7.10%

+4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.93%

8.03%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

7.66%

+6.96%

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHDVD.SW has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CHDVD.SW vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

CHDVD.SW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than BNDW's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDW
Vanguard Total World Bond ETF
4.23%4.12%3.90%3.73%2.02%2.58%1.56%3.05%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHDVD.SW
iShares Swiss Dividend ETF (CH)
3.23%3.46%3.32%3.48%3.48%2.92%3.07%3.25%3.83%3.50%2.70%3.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHDVD.SW and BNDW have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDW is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDW is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CHDVD.SW.

CHDVD.SW is categorized as Europe Equities, while BNDW is Global Bonds. CHDVD.SW tracks SPI® Select Dividend 20 Index, while BNDW tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHDVD.SW and 0.05% for BNDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHDVD.SW and BNDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer