CHDN vs. TSLA
CHDN (Churchill Downs Incorporated) and TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — CHDN in Gambling, TSLA in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 10 years, CHDN returned 14.99%/yr vs 35.29%/yr for TSLA. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CHDN vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHDN achieves a -25.91% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -30.80% return. Over the past 10 years, CHDN has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 14.99%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 35.29% annualized return.
CHDN
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- 6M
- -14.29%
- YTD
- -25.91%
- 1Y
- -20.46%
- 3Y*
- -10.30%
- 5Y*
- -1.60%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.09%
TSLA
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -20.90%
- 6M
- -27.69%
- YTD
- -30.80%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 35.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 40.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $102.86M | $85.15M | $87.04M | |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | $15.40B | $15.32B | $18.68B |
CHDN vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHDN Churchill Downs Incorporated | -25.91% | -14.47% | -0.74% | 28.06% | -11.95% | 24.05% | 42.47% | 69.49% | 5.47% | 55.74% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -30.80% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 49.76% | 743.44% | 25.70% | 6.89% | 45.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHDN and TSLA is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CHDN and TSLA has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CHDN:
$5.88B
TSLA:
$1.23T
CHDN:
$5.79
TSLA:
$1.08
CHDN:
14.55
TSLA:
288.20
CHDN:
0.81
TSLA:
35.26
CHDN:
1.99
TSLA:
10.62
CHDN:
4.40
TSLA:
12.68
CHDN:
$2.99B
TSLA:
$103.62B
CHDN:
$604.00M
TSLA:
$19.53B
CHDN:
$1.02B
TSLA:
$10.41B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHDN vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
CHDN
TSLA
CHDN vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHDN | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 0.02 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 0.06 | -1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHDN vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHDN drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDN and TSLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHDN | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.86% | -73.63% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.15% | -39.10% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.91% | -53.77% | +9.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.34% | -73.63% | +29.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.86% | -73.63% | +10.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.88% | -36.47% | -6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.66% | -22.72% | +5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.26% | 15.31% | +2.95% |
Volatility
CHDN vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) is 10.76%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 20.43%. This indicates that CHDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHDN | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.76% | 20.43% | -9.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.76% | 34.55% | -6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.71% | 46.36% | -12.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.73% | 59.65% | -26.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.66% | 59.43% | -21.77% |
Dividends
CHDN vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
CHDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHDN Churchill Downs Incorporated | 0.52% | 0.38% | 0.31% | 0.28% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.32% | 0.42% | 0.67% | 0.65% | 0.88% | 0.81% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CHDN vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Churchill Downs Incorporated and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHDN vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison
CHDN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 980.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.75B and revenue of 28.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.8%.
CHDN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported an operating income of 357.00M and revenue of 980.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 398.00M and revenue of 28.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.4%.
CHDN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Churchill Downs Incorporated reported a net income of 241.00M and revenue of 980.00M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 28.24B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHDN and TSLA have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLA has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to CHDN (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHDN dropped -62.86% vs TSLA's -73.63%.
TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHDN and TSLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer