PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CHDN vs. XLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CHDN and XLY is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

CHDN vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-12.03%
22.95%
CHDN
XLY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CHDN:

-0.09

XLY:

1.36

Sortino Ratio

CHDN:

0.04

XLY:

1.89

Omega Ratio

CHDN:

1.01

XLY:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

CHDN:

-0.08

XLY:

1.41

Martin Ratio

CHDN:

-0.31

XLY:

6.46

Ulcer Index

CHDN:

6.61%

XLY:

3.93%

Daily Std Dev

CHDN:

23.60%

XLY:

18.72%

Max Drawdown

CHDN:

-62.86%

XLY:

-59.05%

Current Drawdown

CHDN:

-18.40%

XLY:

-6.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHDN achieves a -9.47% return, which is significantly lower than XLY's -0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, CHDN has outperformed XLY with an annualized return of 22.91%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.87% annualized return.


CHDN

YTD

-9.47%

1M

-5.69%

6M

-10.57%

1Y

1.79%

5Y*

8.70%

10Y*

22.91%

XLY

YTD

-0.27%

1M

0.75%

6M

26.87%

1Y

28.06%

5Y*

12.19%

10Y*

12.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHDN vs. XLY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHDN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHDN is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHDN is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHDN is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHDN is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHDN is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHDN is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

XLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLY is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLY is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLY is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLY is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLY is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLY is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHDN vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CHDN, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.091.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for CHDN, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.041.89
The chart of Omega ratio for CHDN, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.011.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for CHDN, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.081.41
The chart of Martin ratio for CHDN, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.316.46
CHDN
XLY

The current CHDN Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHDN and XLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.09
1.36
CHDN
XLY

Dividends

CHDN vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

CHDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than XLY's 0.72% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
0.34%0.31%0.28%0.34%0.28%0.32%0.42%0.67%0.65%0.88%0.81%1.05%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.72%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%1.31%

Drawdowns

CHDN vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHDN drawdown since its inception was -62.86%, which is greater than XLY's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHDN and XLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-18.40%
-6.38%
CHDN
XLY

Volatility

CHDN vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) at 4.75%. This indicates that CHDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.01%
4.75%
CHDN
XLY
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab